@Slimboyfat
Thank you for even acknowledging that early 1st and 2nd century church Leaders quoted 1 Timothy 3: 16 as "God" and not "He".
It creates an unmimaginable situation where if the verse was supposedly written as "He" all along until the 4th century until someone changed it, that you you would have so many church leaders quote that verse as "God" centuries earlier. If fact, it just provides more evidence of the unrelialability of the Alexdrian texts which account for less than 10% of all manuscripts. The same could be said for most of the "disputed" verses Unitarians try to use against Christians.
it could be compatible with JW theology because Jesus was the one who revealed the invisible God because he is the exact representation of his Father.
But that's not what it says is it? It could mean just what is says: God was manifest in the flesh.
Would you mind answering my questions as to whether or not you would allow the Spirit of Christ to inhabit you? If Christ is anything other than God, like an angel for instance wouldn't that be about the same as demon posession?
"If any man have not the spirit of Christ, he is none of his". - Romans 8: 9
Don't you want to belong to Christ?